A friend recently revealed a research project they’re currently working on What does a great Primary Care Digital offer look like?’ We talked some on GP websites and how we connect with patients. I shared my usual unstructured rants. So I thought I’d share a bit of my thoughts with you. solicit your feedback.
The introduction to this project
When I learned about this study, my first reaction was to inquire whether I could be a part of the research team too. In the beginning, I wanted to make certain that someone working as a general practitioner could give an operational view. Additionally, I was trying to stay clear of “a solution” that could create more burdens for already stretched staff members of the practice. As a practice manager for eight years and working with patient Groups for over 15 years, I’ve always had an desire to use digital tools to share information and have made a few connections to the world of user experience and digital design. This seemed to be a good chance to collaborate in this. As with many practices, I was aware that our website needed a revamp and we had registered with our Web hosting service provider back in 2012. We’ve, while we’ve I’ve played around with it but not changed the appearance since. There have been updates to software however, since we’d been on the verge of joining a new company for a while I was constantly thinking that we should wait and then design a practice-wide website that has an official look and more capabilities. The first question: as an individual or a caregiver what do you do to get data from your GP surgery? Check out the website of your doctor’s practice and check when it last changed and consider, does it have the information I’m looking for? What else is there that you did not know about? If you have a health-related concern, where can you go to find information? Please let me know so that we will try to provide this.
Why aren’t websites up-to-date?
The reasons behind the inability to update websites regularly can be numerous, but most of them are due to the pressure of time. I was also worried that if we altered our GP surgery website design, I would get bombarded with complaints from patients who wanted to know where the items had been moved to similar to the way you move items through the aisles of the supermarket. While we update information frequently however, the process is cumbersome The site’s design and layout aren’t easy to use and, from a practical standpoint it’s just another thing to complete.
Value for money or is it too costly?
The process of funding a new website another problem. Larger (or more well-funded) practices could decide to purchase a custom product, while smaller practices might think of it as an added expense. A well-designed website should provide high value for money, and especially when it provides patients with information on the best service that meets their requirements or provides hyperlinks to local, pertinent guidance on health problems and prevention of disease and self-care. One of the top priorities for the health system currently is the need for patients to make use of services in a responsible manner. It is a challenge for people to use services responsibly. NHS is so intricate and confusing that it is difficult for people to find the right place to go? visit 111, your local walk-in centres general practice, specialist community services, A&E – the list continues. General Practice is seen as the primary entry point into the NHS therefore it is believed that it is their responsibility to direct patients. However, does it actually fall to the GPs task to provide a complete description of the available options? A well-designed and informative website will allow rapid access to information as well as effective signposting of services without the need to sit in a phone waiting room. However, many practices purchase the most basic off the shelf template-based website at less than PS500 annually, and offer no direction on what to do within the NHS. Perhaps, all of those services should be able to provide details about what time to visit the GP?
From a visitor’s standpoint, we cannot more access page views, which means we aren’t able to determine the number of people who visit our site or if the data is valuable. The field of web analytics is a mystery to most practitioners.
Functionality – Frontfacing with back office?
There are websites who not only host data but also collect information about patients by using online forms. They aim to stream patient inquiries to specific teams i.e. administrative, medication queries and clinical support (e.g. asthma questions). These forms are often paired with other’Online consultation forms. These sites help practices with crucial data capture, and offer a method of triage however, how can practices be secure from risk i.e. data protection, clinical good practice etc. Certain practices are cautious about opening new channels to accept more work streams, specifically because not all of them are integrated into the practice’s Clinical Health Record system, which means that clinical coding isn’t available. It is possible that these functions are considered not as “additional” rather as alternative methods to handle inquiries; better than having to make a time with a GP for a non-clinical query, isn’t it?
A majority of website providers offer back office or intranet functionality for their practices to store and create information like rooms schedules, contact lists as well as staff rotas for major events such as fridge temperatures, policies and procedures and procedures. They are utilized by all employees and are used to prepare appraisals and proof of compliance to regulators. These functions are increasingly being substituted by better tools for collaboration and compliance like GPTeamnet, Fourteen Fish etc
Do they have the proper design and communication capabilities?
I’m not afraid to admit that I’ve got “font and layout’ concerns. the limitations of text styles annoys me, and I’m not a fan of this job because there are many other things to be done and I’ve never been able to take the time to properly use it and I’m sure that many Practice Managers are similar. I also lack the skills required to design the layout efficient or integrate images or graphics to are able to replace written words.
While templates offer several choices but the design and formatting functions can be quite restricted and difficult to navigate. It’s easy to recognize the difference between a custom, high-quality design in a generic ‘off the shelf template. The majority of businesses wouldn’t be able to determine where to begin with regards to putting the most commonly used items or pages in the front of the page or creating eye-catching designs that draw attention of users and communicate effectively.
NHS Digital have kindly provided guidelines that we can follow – I have shared it with other practices and I doubt that anyone has actually taken the time to read it or implemented modifications as a result. I’m sure I’ve not had the time.
This is a part of NHS Digital, creating standards designed to ensure accessibility and inclusion as well as a good user experience. Many websites do not address the ever-growing need for a good accessibility in their design or practices. with the expectation that their site is compliant with the legal standards for accessibility and inclusion. This guide is helpful for designers but it is over the skill and understanding of most practitioners and I don’t know how to begin evaluating our current service provider against these guidelines. It would be beneficial that any provider of an online service could demonstrate they meet the requirements of this standard to ensure that their practices are confirmed prior to purchasing.
NHS Generic information repeated?
The latest GMS GP contract requires practices to maintain an up-to present and well-informed online presence before the year 2020 (page 35). If we decide to go with the ‘Digital First’ method for those who decide to do this, websites’ primary purpose is being replaced by many other applications. There are apps everywhere, here, and everywhere. More practices make use of social media platforms to communicate information quickly and widely in addition to traditional publications and posters within the surgery. There are numerous online services that are available, or methods for patients to use these services through alternative browsers to the web.
Don’t overlook that NHS.UK (not known as NHS Choices any more) has created a distinct site for every practice as well as certain of the National data for links to performance for this web site i.e. stars and reviews about the service provided. The practice’s site has always been part of the basic General Medical Services contract requirement for some timenow, however I doubt that many practices will have updated their NHS.uk website, as well as their own website. Many will simply link to their personal website. Each practice is likely to have hyperlinks to GP survey feedback and star ratings Who’s who, what time we’re open etc in multiple places . This is yet another reason why we have inaccurate information. Connecting to NHS.uk is made by the clinic system provider (i.e. which online services are linked) which feeds national contract management tools , such like those in the Primary Care Web tool. It’s also the place in which CQC will seek feedback and suggestions.
Primary care networks working as primary care
As more practices join forces and form networks to offer shared services, access and information should be available via one site and not spread across multiple websites. While some practices prefer to maintain their own “front doors’ to ensure a consistent experience with patients, the majority would be happy to give up the back office’ responsibility of updating their websites as well as linking them to additional NHS products and services.
Social Media, Reviews , and Comments
The next phase of the process is interesting as patients ‘check in’ and reflect on their experience with tools such as Facebook, Google review and I Want Great Care . These platforms invite patients to “like” or leave comments after attending Practices can decide to control these sites and either respond or deny however they are not able to delete comments. They will remain in the open for other users to see with no response. Certain practices are not happy with this and are extremely concerned of security breaches and creating new channels for communication. They might have an unpleasant experience with social media and do not want to take on the task of training staff members to be proficient and safe in a field that crosses into leisure and other off-work activities.
If used with care social media can be a highly efficient alternative ways of communicating to mobile phone users. The recent blog post from one of the practices reached more than 1m people to inform them of cervical screening. This is a way to encourage interaction, not an information push in one direction and is able to effectively and quickly with minimal effort.
Many practices are using messages and social media to interact with patients, groups , and entire segments of the population that practice and also provide opportunities for “communities of interests” and large-scale communication on federated levels within General Practice. This is a must as an integral part of any new communications system.
Online access to services
Since more and more services are being offered online, developers of applications offer more efficient options to GP practice’s website to facilitate transactions like making appointments, cancelling appointments making prescriptions, etc. There is a market-based approach to the creation of these online services , and practices are struggling to keep pace and educate their teams to provide information and guidance on the available options for their patients. Each app appears to provide distinct functions. This means that the which app to choose will depend upon the requirements of the patient.
According to the website’s provider, some sites connect to a clinic’s medical system for online services, but they can only provide only one online service, and there aren’t many options. While patients have the option of choosing from a range of ways to use online services, at present the website providers aren’t allowing this option. This restricts practices and patients who want to offer and avail a range options of services online. The only method to accomplish this is to use weblinks , not widgets or applications to promote the possibilities to patients. Four of the current providers: Evergreen Life, Patient Access, Dimec and Iplato all offer apps for messaging, cancellation, booking and medication ordering medical records viewer, however, not all of them have browsers. In contrast, some online consultation services only use browsers. The NHS app is expected to launch in the near future however, as of now we don’t exactly how this will connect to a practice site or a browser.
© Denbight ICT All Rights Reserved